Sponsored By

Sponsored By
An organization or individual has paid for the creation of this work but did not approve or review it.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT

North Dakota House narrowly passes bill allowing babies to live with their mothers in prison

Senate Bill 2352 would authorize the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to allow children 18 months or younger to live with their mothers at the Heart River Correctional Center.

011125.N.FF.PrisonWEB.jpeg
Troy Becker / The Forum

BISMARCK — North Dakota lawmakers barely passed a bill Wednesday, March 26, seeking to allow a women's prison to create a nursery program where babies can live with their incarcerated mothers.

After a debate that lasted nearly an hour, Senate Bill 2352 passed the House with a 48-42 vote.

The legislation is likely to be reconsidered since 48 votes are required for a bill to pass and four members were absent or not voting Wednesday.

SB 2352 would authorize the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to allow children 18 months or younger to live with their mothers at the Heart River Correctional Center in Mandan.

The facility is currently under construction and scheduled to open in 2027, when the program would be effective.

SB 2352 has the same intent as failed Senate Bill 2115, which was struck down by the Senate in January by an 18-29 vote. Opposing lawmakers cited concerns about the bill's uncertain, but potentially large, fiscal note.

The bill has since been slimmed from eight pages to a few sentences. Its original language would have exempted prison staff from being held liable if the child was injured — unless those injuries resulted from a negligent employee.

Liability isn't directly addressed in what remains of the bill, but it does require the department to enact policies to protect the child.

Costs associated with implementation are based on "future liability events," according to its fiscal note, which lists $100,000 as a ballpark figure for the 2027-29 biennium.

ADVERTISEMENT

Allowing mothers and their young children to live together is better for both parties involved, DOCR leaders and other proponents say.

During the Wednesday debate, 14 representatives voiced varying opinions about what's more ethical and cost-effective: keeping babies with their imprisoned mothers or putting them in the foster system instead.

"I've had the honor and privilege of arresting some of those women," said Rep. TJ Brown, R-Fargo. "I cannot prioritize the incarcerated mother's interest over the well-being of the child; while babies may not understand their surroundings, a prison environment may have far-reaching effects on their development."

032625-SB2352-02.jpg
Rep. TJ Brown, R-Fargo, speaks against Senate Bill 2352 during a House session at the North Dakota Capitol on Wednesday, March 26, 2025.
Tanner Ecker / The Bismarck Tribune

Other opponents said the bill is incomplete and lacks necessary statutory oversight to protect a baby by not addressing liability.

Supporters emphasized that the bill merely authorizes the DOCR to plan for the program ahead of the new facility opening, pointing to states where similar programs have shown to reduce recidivism rates and improve the health of both the mothers and their babies.

Many supporting lawmakers also referenced their time visiting with mothers who are incarcerated.

032625-SB2352-04.jpg
Rep. Jon Nelson, R-Rugby, speaks on Senate Bill 2352 during a House session at the North Dakota Capitol on Wednesday, March 26, 2025.
Tanner Ecker / The Bismarck Tribune

"Listening to the debate today, it (visiting the facilities) should be a requirement, not a wish," said Rep. Jon Nelson, R-Rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

"Yes, you can be honored to pick up somebody off the streets that's on a drug-ravaged crime and think you've done your civic duty, but it's a different person when they get to the Heart River facility," he continued. "These women don't have the services that we have at the North Dakota State Penitentiary. This is the hope that they look for."

MORE NEWS FROM THE NORTH DAKOTA LEGISLATURE
Subscribers Only
Attorney General Drew Wrigley claims that crime rates are soaring as convicts are let out of prison too early. Yet the North Dakota's crime rate is flat and the prison population has skyrocketed.
Sens. Cole Conley, R-Jamestown, and Sean Cleary, R-Bismarck, were opposed.
Amendment would set the effective date for the start of term limits as Jan. 1, 2023,
A recap of the bills and resolutions now active in North Dakota.
Legislative management would study potential outcomes of allowing low-risk sex offenders to apply to be removed from the state registry after being on it for seven years instead of 15.
Rep. Landon Bahl believes the plan would accommodate more timely decision-making. An opponent believes it could increase costs and limit farmers from joining the Legislature.
Legislation is being drafted to provide federal protection for the wild horses at Theodore Roosevelt National Park, according to Sen. John Hoeven.
The bill received a unanimous 16-0 recommendation to pass as amended out of committee. It now goes to the Senate floor.
The bill, which requires institutions of higher education to establish a tenure policy, had failed on the Senate floor Tuesday.
Have something to say?

Readers with thoughts about this issue can contact their local legislators, testify in person, submit written testimony online, write a letter to the editor, leave a comment below or email Forum News Service reporter Peyton Haug at phaug@forumcomm.com.
To track this bill, readers can download North Dakota Legislative Daily — a free app available on Google Play and the Apple App Store.

Peyton Haug joined The Forum as the Bismarck correspondent in June 2024. Reach Peyton at phaug@forumcomm.com.
Conversation

ADVERTISEMENT

What To Read Next
Get Local

ADVERTISEMENT